On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 09:47:38AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 02:38:34PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> > Anyway, waiting for DAM for some months now. I guess it has been
> > 4-5 months now. I asked him on IRC when he might get arround to
> > my application, but he just said when he has time...
>
> He actually replied?
>
> I saw him talking on irc and thus knew he was around and
> breathing. But not even a "bugger off" reply when I asked him.
Maybe you didn't ask right :) But you will probably get the same
response as I got - he'll get arround to it when he has time.
> > But I have no complains.. well, maybe except that every week or two
> > the parties responsible for the applicant (eg, AM or DAM) should
> > send out a status reports or something. That way there would be
> > less stagnation in the entire process. Why? Because people want to
> > do least amount of work to do their job. Just a suggestion.
>
> A simple timestamps on the application webpage showing the last time
> the AM or DAM did anything with the application would be a plus
> already.
But *if* the DAM or AM would need to write a status report every
week or two re: applications they are responsible for, there would be a
tendancy to
either:
1. reject the applicant (eg. when applicant doesn't reply to
email or doesn't know what make does)
2. accept the applicant
And the reason for that is because people don't want to write reports!
