Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [ I'm including the debian-devel list in CC since I appreciate the > opinion of others developpers ]
> James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> This package is dubiously small enough as it is without being split >> into two. There's no need to separate the 2k .el file into a separate >> package. If depending on emacs bothers you, make it a suggests. > Yes, the packages is small *but* IMHO this should be splited in two > since the -el package can but not used. Other issue is the last > depends of emacsen and someone can doesn't like have an emacsen > installed in machine. [...] If that "bothers you, make it a suggests" instead of a depends. What point am I missing? cu andreas -- Hey, da ist ein Ballonautomat auf der Toilette! Unofficial _Debian-packages_ of latest unstable _tin_ http://www.logic.univie.ac.at/~ametzler/debian/tin-snapshot/