Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> [ I'm including the debian-devel list in CC since I appreciate the >> opinion of others developpers ] > >> James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> This package is dubiously small enough as it is without being split >>> into two. There's no need to separate the 2k .el file into a separate >>> package. If depending on emacs bothers you, make it a suggests. > >> Yes, the packages is small *but* IMHO this should be splited in two >> since the -el package can but not used. Other issue is the last >> depends of emacsen and someone can doesn't like have an emacsen >> installed in machine. > [...] > > If that "bothers you, make it a suggests" instead of a depends. > What point am I missing?
The opinion of James is not the same of my. I doesn't want to do all thinks like he want but yes like the policy and major of users say. The Social Contract say: The focus is the user. So, to enduser is more easy provide two packages and he can choice what to do. -- O T A V I O S A L V A D O R --------------------------------------------- E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio ---------------------------------------------