On Tuesday 16 Dec 2003 17:21, Joel Baker wrote:
> Point #4: For at least the one proposed name ('Nienna'), it is, in fact,
> representable (properly) in US/ASCII. Even the rest are all representable
> in a clearly identifiable degenerate form (that is, no worse than many
> Europeans already have to endure) in US/ASCII, and are completely
> representable using ISO-8859-1 (or, of course, UTF-8, which is my personal
> preference).
It is worth noting that any project name may also be used for associated
domain names, file names etc., so ASCII is nice.
