Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 12:56:36PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > It may sound a bit radical, but core points have been mentioned in the > > thread already. I suggest to do it in a more radical way: > > > > - unstable lockdown in the freeze > > - drop Testing and concentrate on work instead of wasting time on > > synching stuff. This eliminates the need for testing-security. See > > the last part of the paper for details. > > You _are_ aware that this is approximately how it was done before woody, no?
With three 1-month test cycles to get frozen into a reasonable and releaseable state? Regards, Joey -- MIME - broken solution for a broken design. -- Ralf Baechle Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.