On May 26, Joey Hess wrote > Andreas Jellinghaus: > > > Would someone mind if I add the following entry to the list of virtual > > > package names? > > wish any package providing a wish > > > > these packages might also help. > > (tcl and tk cannot be used.) > > I don't think wish is the right name. Unless you're familiar with tk (as > opposed to just trying to get it installed), you may not know that the tk > interperter is named wish.
yes, the tk interpreter is named wish, and any package providing such a tk interpreter, should provide wish ? was my request do inclear formulated ? currently all packages, that will work with any version of tcl (any version of tk), require tcl | tcl7.0 | tcl7.4 | tcl7.6 (require tk | tk4.0 | tk4.1 | tk4.2) but it would be easier to require "tclsh" : that means any package providing a tclsh ("wish" : any package providing a tksh). this way all tcl (tk) and tix (tkx ?) packages should provide this... is this clearer now ? (is thsi correct english ? i'm not sure) regards, andreas -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .