On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 22:26:08 -0800, Bruce Perens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: >> When invited to *reduce* uncertainty and doubt, by securing a >> genuine legal opinion, you said it was Not Your Job. >> >> > What I continue to object to is that there is a minority who believe > that questionable content is desirable in the distribution, but they > refuse to support themselves by doing the legal homework to support > the content they desire. The entire project is burdened by it, and > as one of the directors I am expected to clean up after them. Seems more like there is a more of a minority of uber right wingers trying to batten down art that offends their sensibility. The actual project members seem to be more or less taking the sensible approach, in that this is a mountain being made out of a small molehill. And if you have done the legal homework to prove that the package is illegal, please do presernt it. In the meanwhile, I'll continue to trust my gut that it is innocent, until proven guilty. manoj -- The possession of a book becomes a substitute for reading it. Anthony Burgess Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C