-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Fri, 13 Jun 1997, Brian White wrote:
> > > Do we also want to remove all libc5 dependant packages at some point? I > > > think this would be a good idea since otherwise things are going to get > > > pretty messed up. We might want to do all three immediately. > > > > * all packages should be libc6 when "hamm" is frozen. (later?) > > Yes, they should be. When do we remove all the non-libc6 packages, though? I'm not entirely certain I see why we need to remove libc5 packages from the system for Debian 2.0. While I agree that the primary packages should really be glibc, I don't see how a few lib5 packages are going to hurt the distribution, a.out stuff works fine here too. I can see a program to do non-maintainer uploads of glibc packages for orphaned packages and so forth. +------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | | Your friends will know you better in the | | Scott K. Ellis | first minute you meet than your acquaintances | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | will know you in a thousand years. | | | -- Illusions | +------------------------------------------------------------------------+ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3 Charset: noconv iQCVAwUBM6IngaCk2fENdzpVAQH1GwP/Yap2DrDB3N0y0kA++Hn91OtmAI9irR5m q4i6HCFu4B3uUyBwUEAqwI+PXEyFicWZf0yRohAyXyD0xTFRhuMu0ZRiTYVqdk8Q k944IdY9QWad5ZDohqJLn8UKIEDfYJojz5QJanp5sFyyvAOdRKL+SbQB64Z2lkib vVvbkWv4OWk= =eQA7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
