> On Sun, 15 Jun 1997, Dale Scheetz wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > It seems to me that packages of any priority level should not be dependent
> > upon packages of lower priority.
>
> I totally agree to this.
Yes, I noticed this myself too (in libg++272). I didn't quite
know what to do with it at the time, and I thought "don't fix
what ain't broken", but I've changed libg++272's priority now
to "Important"
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)
#what's this? see http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
