On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 12:41:18PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote: > On Monday 14 March 2005 11:10, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > pcc is barely at 98%. I don't think that barrier should be that high. We > > *should* at last release with the tree most important archs: i386, amd64, > > powerpc. > > Please, 98% is not high. It is just a call to porters to get their act > together. > > I don't believe that any (sane) maintainer would refuse FTBFS fixing patches > (see hurd-i386 and k{net,free}-bsd stuff). These criterions are just a IMHO > necessary step to put the load on those people who want to use the arch > instead of those who maintain central infrastructure.
Like the arm autobuilders for example ? Mmm, but then the arm buildd maintainer is also our main ftp-master, right ? Friendly, Sven luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]