On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 01:51:02PM -0300, Humberto Massa wrote: > Matthias Urlichs wrote: > > >With a decent toolset, doing a security package for 10 architectures > >should be a nearly-constant amount of work, no matter which base the > >number 10 is written in. > > > Speaking of which, can anyone here explain to me why does a two-line > security fix on, say, KDE, makes things need to be recompiled for 12 > days long? (!!!) One could think that there are more incremental ways of > dealing with recompilation of enourmous packages.
Not currently supported, and not really considered as a technical solution. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
