Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thiemo Seufer wrote: >> Hamish Moffatt wrote: >> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 12:06:18PM +0000, Martin Michlmayr wrote: >> > > * Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-14 23:00]: >> > > > But really, is there much benefit in making *releases* for the SCC >> > > > architectures? >> > > >> > > For some SSC arches, it *might* not make a difference (possibly m68k) >> > > but others (e.g. s390 and mipsel) are typically used for servers >> > > or gateways, and you don't really want to run unstable in such >> > > environments. testing+security updates might be a compromise, but >> > > unstable is clearly not an option for a S390 box or a mipsel Cobalt >> > > gateway. >> > >> > OK, that makes sense. Can you buy those architectures new? (Surely yes >> > in the case of s390 at least, probably mipsel also as the mips CPU >> > manufacturers are alive and well.) >> >> AFAIK m68k is the only one which isn't available anymore, unless you >> count its mmu-less variants in. > > Apparently even m68k is still available, as Wouter pointed out. > > > Thiemo
I think the only criteria m68k fails are the "2 buildds have to suffice to keep up with etch" and the "10% download shares". Hell, if it comes down to m68k dropping out because of not enough downloads I will run "while true; apt-get update; apt-get clean; apt-get -d dist-upgrade; done". </irony> MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]