Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 01:17:03PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 11:00:22PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: >> > But really, is there much benefit in >> > making *releases* for the SCC architectures? >> >> What will happen is something like this: >> >> A: "Oh, let's see what we got here.... a nice Alpha server..." >> B: "Let us install Debian on it!" >> *browsing the web* >> A: "Oh, no release of Debian for Alpha... it's unsupported..." >> B: "Sad... it's a nice machine, but without a working Linux on it, we're >> gonna >> throw it away...." > > It's unsupported officially, but unstable is still available. > > The porters could do their own release if they wished.
Not realy. Scc only has unstable snapshots proposed. Thats no way releasable. > It would be interesting to hear how NetBSD/OpenBSD handles this > situation, as they have a lot of ports. (Of course they have far fewer > packages than we do so their problem is on a much smaller scale.) > Do they release new versions on all ports at once? > > > Hamish > -- > Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]