Steve Langasek wrote: > > Considered that ftbfs bugs for scc architectures are not going to be > > RC any more, > > Right, they'll be important instead of serious, the traditional severity > for FTBFS on non-RC archs
Somewhere else in this vast thread, someone suggested that they be serious and etch-ignore instead. Or perhaps serious bugs that are only tagged with a SCC arch should be automatically treated as etch-ignore. This actually seems to make more sense, since they could become RC for etch if we change out minds and add an arch to the set of release arches. Or they might need to become RC after etch if the set of release arches changes then. Any thoughts on this from the BTS admins / RMs? -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
