-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On the other hand, at least these people are employed working on >> > Debian-related stuff, and some of them are allowed to spend some/all of >> > their work time on it. IMHO that's a Good Thing. >> >> Sure that's good. It stops to be that good when they're obviously >> trying hard to impose their employer's agenda on the Project. > > There's no particular reason for Ubuntu developers to try and impose > Canonical's agenda on Debian; we have our own distro for (and because we > have) our own agenda. How could we know ? We know nothing about Ubuntu, nothing about Canonical, nothing about the goals, nothing about how everything was done to begin with, nothing about who works or doesn't work there. Everything was done with the exact same secret used for this plan. And nobody cared enough to write up a proper announcement for Debian developers. How are we supposed to trust you ? I certainly can't until this is fixed. JB. - -- Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQFCNhM+zWFP1/XWUWkRAkXCAJ9GCR5+w5df+Zf02zMOsopnz1txEgCff4X9 ZB54EuNItMoP6bcFM0vga9g= =d468 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
