On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 19:19:32 +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote: [...] > > You'll figure out that the timing for this new policy is absolutely > perfect; we're a week away from the voting period for the new DPL > term. The current DPL can't (and won't, obviously) do anything about > it, and the candidates signed the proposal. I should add that the > Vancouver meeting was announced at the very last minute, too. And I'm > wondering, who paid for the travel expenses ? Did the people involved > pay out of their own pocket ? Did the Project pay ? Did somebody else > pay the bill ? >
Who cares? How is that even remotely relevant to the actual proposal? How is an answer going to be even remotely beneficial to this discussion? >>> I joined the Project because there was no core team to decide what was >>> to be done in an authoritative manner. Today, we have such a core >>> team, and I'm not sure I agree with that anymore (some would rather >>> say it's a cabal, well, their call). >> >> And yet no chance to replace the cabal nor elect other people instead >> of them, which is more like a problem for the project than just a few >> archs, imho. > > We can. > > I hereby ask the people involved in this proposal to step down > immediately from their positions in the Project. You've violated a > couple of rules already, and you've violated the spirit of this Project. > *blink*. Are you high? One of the RMs makes an announcement stating that we're *almost* ready to freeze sarge, and you're asking RMs and FTPMasters to resign? What will that solve, at this point? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]