On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 05:14:54PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > When he declined (after seriously considering the option), and, because > he didn't receive a pledge from you (and thus couldn't in any reasonable > way trust you) locked you out of Debian hardware, you rambled on and > screamed that James is a Bad Guy and should be removed from his roles, > and that Debian as an organisation doesn't trust non-DD's and that it > should do so.
addendum: In case you forgot: What happened was, that he was refusing to add another buildd *over* weeks, although m68k was in real need for that extra power back then. And then he "heard" from someone else that I was doing something bad[TM], which I didn't. I just did what we (me and others) had done many, many times before and what was "public knowledge". But instead of contacting me directly, he spoke to me via a third person. My call to him to communicate directly with me and in a given time frame is nothing unusual, nothing extraordinary complicated or such. If he would have agreed to try better communication with me, I would have agreed to his "demands", which I stated clearly at the beginning. Again, without a proper communication there's no chance of cooperation. Otherwise those kinds of "I've heard that you've done..."-stories would have happen again and again... -- Ciao... // Ingo \X/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]