On 10231 March 1977, David Schmitt wrote: >> > Collecting tidbits of >> > information concerning the various packages rotting in NEW and making >> > that information public. >> A list of packages-in-NEW is available on the Web, including binary >> package names, bugs closed, et al. >> Nothing more can be done by the average bored DD, since they cannot access >> these packages, hence not do most of the necessary checks. > Isn't there a mirror of NEW on merkel?
Yes, but you cant read anything else than .changes files in NEW. > rte (3 years): discussion on debian-legal[1] ended without answer to James > Troup question about details: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/10/msg00090.html > Legal status: Package DFGS-free, possibly patent-encumbered, Need checking of > video MPEG layer-2 encodings status. Encoding mpeg stuff is an enforced patent, and thats not a good thing to get a package in. > kernel-patch-2.4-{blooper,pom} (1 year): > * Fixes for minor annoying kernel bugs > * Netfilter patch-o-matic patches to base level, IPSEC policy match > Both should be superceded by debian-kernel. Could be REJECTed. Should/Could? -- bye Joerg Some NM: graphviz: ouch, that license is hard to read, damn lawyer gibberish. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
