* Junichi Uekawa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > The current recommendation I'm trying to give is: > > Package: libXXXNNNN-dev > Conflicts: libXXX-dev > Provides: libXXX-dev > > > Thus, it won't contradict with your requirement to > be able to just build-depend on libXXX-dev.
Uhh, then it doesn't fix your 'QA' concern anyway... > Having a solid naming scheme will allow me to > > ldd /usr/lib/libwhatever.so to track down its > shared library dependency, and appending "-dev" > to individual package to create the list of > requisite -dev packages. If this is actually necessary for libtool-using packages, then write something which goes through all of the .la files and does this, since that's what libtool wants to do. Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature