On Sep 09, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > There is nothing wrong with this, and I'm not a fan of choice of venue
> > clauses either, but they should try to modify the DFSG then.
> Could you explain why DFSG#5 couldn't be invoked in this case?
It does not work this way. If you believe that a license is not free
it's up to you explaining why.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to