On Sep 09, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There is nothing wrong with this, and I'm not a fan of choice of venue > > clauses either, but they should try to modify the DFSG then. > Could you explain why DFSG#5 couldn't be invoked in this case? It does not work this way. If you believe that a license is not free it's up to you explaining why.
-- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature