2005/9/29, Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Em Qui, 2005-09-29 às 19:05 +0200, Bastian Blank escreveu: > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 01:52:21PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote: > > > I'm having some problems, but I think it's because gcc is confused about > > > which toolchain to use, because it still don't know about > > > i386-uclibc-linux as an architecture, and it's falling back to > > > i386-linux. > > This is correct, as the value between i386 and linux is the vendor. Use > > i386-linux-uclibc. > > Even if all the toolchain is named i386-uclibc-linux? > > daniel
I think the i386-uclibc-linux toolchain was accidentally misnamed. buildroot [1], the uClibc toolchain distribution tool, calls the toolchain xxx-linux-uclibc, not xxx-uclibc-linux. Consider that in xxx-linux-gnu the -gnu part stands for glibc. Now replace the -gnu with -uclibc for a uClibc toolchain. You can also play with config.sub to see this effect: $ /usr/share/misc/config.sub i386-uclibc-linux i386-uclibc-linux-gnu $ /usr/share/misc/config.sub i386-linux-uclibc i386-pc-linux-uclibc The latter config name is correct. Cheers, Shaun [1] http://buildroot.uclibc.org/
