On Tuesday 08 November 2005 02:26, Erast Benson wrote: > > Erast Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> If you do not see something specific, or newer versions, like(you can > >> find > >> debarchiver-0.3 but we have debarchiver-0.4 packaged), that means it is > >> not committed yet and we are testing it right now and will be committed > >> shortly. > > > > Erast, > > > > Unless you provide a written offer, good for three years, to supply the > > source on request, you *must* provide the source code for a binary > > alongside the binary. That means that the source code for a specific > > version of the binary must be downloadable before you can provide that > > binary. Providing binaries without the appropriate source code (as > > required under 3(a) of the GPL) or a written offer for the same (GPL > > 3(b)) is a violation of the license, and thus infringes the copyright of > > the authors. > > OK. point taken. This will be "fixed" soon. Hopefully in Alpha 1, which > bits is planned to be release by the end of this week.
Sorry, this is another violation. The source comes first, then binaries next to it. Hm, I wonder how could you make people believe (trust>) in your "open source" project ? -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu> fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]