Hi Frank!
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> > texlive-languages-source 37M
> > texlive-base-source 78M
> > texlive-extra-source 172M
>
> Whether this is a good idea depends on a decision that, IIRC, we have
> not yet talked about: Will you only provide packages of the released
> version, or also of (usable) development versions? In the latter case,
Irrelevant.
> I think it would be a good idea to keep documentation sources and TeX
> input file sources together. Otherwise you'd have to rebuilt all
> packages from texlive-documentation-source and texlive-languages-source
> just because one language package was updated on CTAN and mirrored in
> TeXLive.
No, because a tpm is treated as unit, thus the documentation and
source/input files are always in sync.
the documentation-foobar packages provide documentation in the
respective language if available.
> And generally I wonder: Don't you generate most of the documentation
> from dtx files, and many input files from the same dtx files? Then why
No, I use what is in the depot of perforce texlive.
Best wishes
Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <preining AT logic DOT at> Università di Siena
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You're bound to be unhappy if you optimize everything.
--- Donald E. Knuth
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
