On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 09:01:53AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Russ wrote: > > > In fact, upload notifications (the one that includes the changelog) are > > > not, so far as I can tell, sent to the maintainer by default and I end up > > > subscribing to the PTS to get those even for packages where I'm the only > > > maintainer. > > I subscribe to debian-devel-changes for that. :-) > > On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Mike Hommey wrote: > > ... and maintainers should be subscribed to that by default. > > There's room for improvement indeed. > > I would be in favor of a tighter integration between the PTS and the > <package>@packages.debian.org email address too for example. > > I could implement a default subscription to the PTS for package > maintainers but you first need to solve several problems: > - decide which keywords they will receive by default (all except bts, > bts-control and upload-binary is my choice, and maybe katie-other)
I'd say upload-binary should be sent to the maintainer. It helps seing when stuff are built and uploaded, and when binNMU occur. > - when the maintainer changes, we logically need to unsubcribe the previous. > So this must be recorded somewhere. (it's not a subscription like the > others) Isn't that a non issue if you subscribe <package>@p.d.o ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]