On 7/29/06, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 12:23:33 -0500, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:> On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 05:44:38PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote: >> > If Debian had slightly less of a culture of "Keep your hands off >> > my package", I'd do it here instead. >> >> That seems understandable. I'm keen on teams, but even more keen >> on a less "ownery" stance by package owners. > I agree. We should do it like the BSDs: a tree that any developer > can commit to, for any package. How would you handle dilution of responsibility? Or too many people making broad commits to to many packages without considering the details of the particular package being touched? When everyone is responsible for something, no one is responsible.
Group admins. A group can have more than one admin, but at least one is reachable and/or is leading the group (eg: python-modules, d-i), if not the group organization is broken, but it happens more often with the one man approach by default, IMHO. regards, -- stratus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
