On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 12:19:34PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > I totally agree. If I were forced to reduce my involvement in Debian, I > would probably start by losing interest in "politics", since I could > easily trust other, better-informed DD, to make better choices than I > would do. That wouldn't hurt the Debian project, or at least much less > than poorly maintaining my packages.
I agree on the low-risk for the project, but a DD not interested in Debian "politics" has no need to be a DD. If it's just a matter of technical work then sponsorship would be enough. I consider Debian "politics" as a relevant part of my being a DD and I personally feel it as a duty to be informed on it, nothing different that being a citizen of my country after all (no, you're right, Italian politics has been much worst than Debian's in the past years :-) Note that with being informed of course I don't mean following thoroughly a significant amount of mailing list, but the bare minimum of -vote archives just before voting is not requiring that much. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ (15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the (15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
