On Jul 29, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So is anything ever valid other than openbsd-inetd | inet-superserver as a > dependency? I keep getting confused on the rules around using virtual > packages. Would rlinetd | inet-superserver be okay? Would Formally yes, but I do not think there is a reason for a package to choose a different default.
> inet-superserver all by itself be okay? No, but this would be taken care of by virtual-package-depends-without-real-package-depends (which explains the part you are missing). -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
