On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:00:58 +0200 "Francesco P. Lovergine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 12:52:33AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > > That's equivalent to an indefinite quarantine; according to BDB > > upstream, OpenLDAP's problems with various versions are a > > consequence of abusing the interface, not of using "advanced > > features". I'm not sure why the burden here should be on BDB alone. > > > > That remembers me some other cases where people insist to use a non > stable C++ API instead of the C one. One could ask himself who is > guilty: the upstream who releases as public his private functions, > or developer who use them ? :-D The issues I'd heard of with respect to openldap were actually of stability and speed, so blame my lie with both parties. Mike. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]