On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 11:51:07AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > Well, not completely true. There might be more than one understanding. > > Mine is that providing a inet-superserver provides the _functionality_ > > of a inet-superserver not the same _config file_.
> wrong. providing inet-superserver means that you are able to perform > what any implementation of inetd(8) does, namely, reading > /etc/inetd.conf, and _then_ possibly have extended features on its own. Where is that documented? Watching the progression of inetd packages in Debian has been dizzying, I don't have the sense that there's any sort of central plan that everyone's following. This virtual package's semantics certainly aren't documented in policy. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
