On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:34:47PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > [0] the reasoning is: this is clear to me that through update-inetd > that is the debian way to enable inet-like services, something > that claims to be an inet-superserver must react on update-inetd > triggered changes. update-inetd atm only acts on /etc/inetd.conf, > so as a consequences I believe it's necessary for an > inet-superserver provider to grok /etc/inetd.conf.
This is at odds with many years of discussion on this mailing list, where the consensus was that xinetd should have its own update-inetd that supports the xinetd config format natively. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
