On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:01:30 +0000, Neil Williams wrote: > > I appreciate the strive to make Debian work on small machines, but it > > is reasonable to put their constraints on the whole project? > IMHO the Packages.gz file is already too large for my standard Debian > machines!
I see this point and I agree to it. Maybe a better place for Tincho's idea would be an (optional) debian/bugtracker file (similar to debian/watch). FWIW: The idea of being able to type "bts forward 123456" (instead of forward_ed_) sounds really appealing to me. Or an equivalent to uscan like 'ubts'. (And it would need some additional local config for credentials for upstream bug trackers etc.) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : debian: the universal operating system - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/ `- NP: Larimar: Drive
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature