On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 04:11:09PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>   IOW basically, just do your usual workflow, bts-link adds 0 overhead
> on your work, that's exactly why it's valuable.

Huh?  This is just as true for the proposal we're discussing here, which
you seem to claim gives too much overhead...

Thanks,
Bas

-- 
I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org).
If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader.
Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text
   in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word.
Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either.
For more information, see http://pcbcn10.phys.rug.nl/e-mail.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to