On Sat, Nov 15 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> we all agree that the result of "Further discussion" is the following,
>> don't we?
>>
>> i Do we require source for firmware in main: As usual
>> ii Do we allow the Release Team to ignore SC violation bugs: As usual
>> iii What do we do for Lenny: Release
>> iV Do we modify foundation documents: No
>> v Do we override foundation documents No
>
> Hm, no, the impression that I got from this discussion that at least
> several people here think the result of "Further discussion" is:
>
> i Do we require source for firmware in main: Yes
> ii Do we allow the Release Team to ignore SC violation bugs: No
> iii What do we do for Lenny: Wait
> iV Do we modify foundation documents: No
> v Do we override foundation documents No
>
> and that seems to be consistent with what Manoj is ruling about overrides
> of the SC.
This is my reading, yes. As far as I see, the SC is pretty
clear, and leaves us no other option.
manoj
--
UNIX was half a billion (500000000) seconds old on Tue Nov 5 00:53:20
1985 GMT (measuring since the time(2) epoch). -- Andy Tannenbaum
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
