Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> The proposers and sponsors of option 5 didn't propose this as an amendment >> to the current GR. Why should they have to *withdraw* the proposal in order >> to get it considered separately at a later time? > > They only need to do so to prevent it from being on the current > ballot. I think it would be a pity of any of the 6 options is > withdrawn, since any of them could lend us relief from the current mess > wrt Lenny release.
Why? The option was proposed as GR on it's own and it was seconded this way. Even if I can see where you're coming from in merging it into the "current" GR, that's not what was asked for. Do we now need a GR to tell the secretary that a proposed and seconded GR should not be merged into other GRs? -- Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer GPG Fingerprint: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
