Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Frankly there is far less difference between GLIBC 2.9 and EGLIBC 2.9 > than between GLIBC 2.9 and GLIBC 2.10. > > I could also have just taken the EGLIBC patches and put them in > debian/patches, no one would have noticed.
I'm sure your decision will either, 1. work perfectly and make your jobs much easier, or 2. create a massive blob of RC bugs tomorrow. Since you guys knows what you are doing, #1 is by far more likely. In either case, I'll be installing the friendlier-upstream version tonight. I wish you luck with the new upstream. Let's hope the change will finally fix some of the old, old problems with glibc. Cheers, - Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
