On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mercredi 17 juin 2009 à 12:40 +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : > > * `Bug-<Vendor>` or `Bug` (optional) > > > > - It contains one or more URLs (space separated) pointing to the related > > bugs > > - (possibly fixed by the patch). The `Bug` field is reserved > > - for the bug URL(s) in the upstream bug tracker. > > + It contains one URL pointing to the related bug (possibly fixed by the > > + patch). The `Bug` field is reserved for the bug URL in the upstream > > + bug tracker. Those fields can be used multiple times if several > > + bugs are concerned. > > It’s already better, but for more readability, would it be possible to > have a registered list of bug tracking aliases? For example: > Bug-Debian: #12345 > Bug-Ubuntu: #2356 > Bug-GNOME: #5671
It should be possible. I see one problem here though. Bug-Gnome is really "Bug" because it's the upstream bug. While we can have an URL mapping for each vendor, it's not possible for the non-qualified entry used for the upstream case. > Otherwise, I appreciate the proposed changes. They make it less of a > problem if the information in the package is not up-to-date and follow > our maintenance process closely. Thanks for the feedback. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Contribuez à Debian et gagnez un cahier de l'admin Debian Lenny : http://www.ouaza.com/wp/2009/03/02/contribuer-a-debian-gagner-un-livre/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org