On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:40:01PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 06:12:49PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > > * `Signed-off-by` (optional)
> > For the avoidance of confusion I would suggest that this be changed to > > Reviewed-by - the normal Linux/git Signed-off-by has a specific meaning > > that needn't include actually doing a code review. > I started first with "Reviewed-by" and then thought that it was stupid to > not reuse the name that is already vastly used for a similar purpose. What > do other people think? I'm fine with both names. My point here is that Signed-off-by is widely used for a *different* purpose. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
