Mark Brown <broo...@sirena.org.uk> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 09:31:24PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Mark Brown <broo...@sirena.org.uk> writes:
>
>> > There seems to be at least some crossover between the people who were
>> > looking at multiarch and the people doing this stuff.
>
>> But not the people blocking the inclusion of patches for multiarch
>> already present in the BTS.
>
> Then bring that up and try to move the discussion forward (as now seems
> to be happening). The approach that's currently being pused seems like
> a blind alley.
People really do seem to confuse this. ia32-apt-get is not an
alternative to multiarch. Never has been, never will be.
It is the ugly hack that keeps existing things running till mutliarch
fixes the problem.
The only thing ia32-apt-get is supposed to fix is ia32-libs and
ia32-libs-gtk unmaintainability and security bugs.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
