On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:09:35PM +0200, C. Gatzemeier wrote: > 3) UID==GID was questioned to be a requrement, probably because it was > seen that it isn't be enforced, but it can be of great help if you > are looking at a filesystem (removable drive) without knowing the > corresponding passwd/groups file. > > So maybe it is sane that UID==GID is a requirement, and its only an > adduser bug when it does not skip IDs that have been taken by non > UPG groups when creating users, and thus does not deliver that > requirement.
I think it is not sane to make this a requirement for UPG, but it would probably be sufficient proof of UPG. Seems worthwhile to change adduser how you suggest to me, is there a bug filed to this end? Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100525205411.gd27...@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org
