]] "C. Gatzemeier" | So yes, you can setup UPGs with UID!=GID, but then you'll also | have to set the umask manually to make it work (globally or in gecos or | ldap etc.). | | The UID==GID and username==groupname restriction of the | pam_umask's "usergroups" option ensures that the umask is only relaxed | automatically in very specific defined cases. | | That's why I'am thinking the UID==GID restriction pam_umask makes (and | login made before) can be sane choice. (Others seem to use it also, | and it is upstream.)
The problem is when you then run addgroup foo, every user created after that will not be considered to be a UPG user. Perhaps addgroup shouldn't use the same gid range as what we are using for users, to make this problem at least smaller, if not make it go away. -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87k4qql5gy....@qurzaw.linpro.no