Hi, On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 06:15:41PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > The bug report doesn't explain why this needs to be a Depends: either - > it could be a Recommends AFAICT. To quote the report, "which for some > stuff needs...." - the definition of a Recommends in my book. If
"some stuff" in the sense "I don't know what exactly needs it, but it needs it". > packageA is more than slightly usable without packageB being unpacked, > there is no need for a Depends:, it should be a Recommends. And that is the problem. It opens the .so, no matter what you want. Of course, unless the CLI policy gets in some way changed or someone tells me a better way... Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100606171819.ga31...@rene-engelhard.de
