On 11/06/2010 09:54, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Right, I was being silly. Also, the word "experimental" adds more fear > to the user than just "devel", which is good. Let me rephrase then. How > about we accept MORE packages with LESS checks in Experimental, and have > new maintainers forced in that repository, then if they are seen as > responsive, we upload to SID? Could that be a sponsor's decision already > right now, and be considered a good practice?
I disagree with this new proposed used of experimental. If you do this, you will end up with newbies using experimental to get new stuff and breaking their system to us a big on-going transition in experimental. Vincent -- Vincent Danjean GPG key ID 0x9D025E87 vdanj...@debian.org GPG key fingerprint: FC95 08A6 854D DB48 4B9A 8A94 0BF7 7867 9D02 5E87 Unofficial packages: http://moais.imag.fr/membres/vincent.danjean/deb.html APT repo: deb http://perso.debian.org/~vdanjean/debian unstable main -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c169925.8040...@free.fr