On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 09:55:22AM +0000, Philipp Kern wrote: > On 2010-06-28, Marco d'Itri <m...@linux.it> wrote: > > If there is no manpower to do better than this then I feel that it would > > be more honest to just use volatile. > > The catch-all for "I can't maintain this stuff properly"[1] is not volatile, > but backports. Thanks.
Speaking of backports, a way to streamline packages from testing to backports would be very much helpful for packages like iceweasel, where basically the package from testing can be installed on a lenny system provided you already use backports for some other libraries. If that's not the case anymore, some of its dependencies should be switched to using symbols files. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100628101928.gb12...@glandium.org
