On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:39:20PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > * Philipp Kern <tr...@philkern.de> [2010-06-28 11:55:22 CEST]: > > On 2010-06-28, Marco d'Itri <m...@linux.it> wrote: > > > If there is no manpower to do better than this then I feel that it would > > > be more honest to just use volatile. > > The catch-all for "I can't maintain this stuff properly"[1] is not volatile, > > but backports. Thanks. > No it isn't, can you please stop disregarding backports in that way? If > you don't like it that's your fault - but calling it a dump place for > stuff that one can't maintain properly couldn't be further from reality.
It seems the irony was well hidden, then. > > [1] No offence meant for the awesome mozilla maintainers. > But offence meant for the backports maintainers? Thanks for the fish. I already took the offence for the volatile maintainers, thanks. Ciao Philipp Kern -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100629213812.ga2...@kelgar.0x539.de
