On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:32, Yves-Alexis Perez <cor...@debian.org> wrote: > On 19/11/2010 08:52, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: >> Anyone knows why and how to fix that? Would a “breaks” instead of a >> “conflicts” fix it? > > Seems that “Breaks:” doesn't work either: > >> Investigating (0) xfce4-settings [ amd64 ] < none -> 4.6.5-3 > ( xfce ) >> Broken xfce4-settings:amd64 Breaks on xfce4-mcs-plugins [ amd64 ] < 4.4.2-4 >> > ( x11 ) >> Considering xfce4-mcs-plugins:amd64 0 as a solution to >> xfce4-settings:amd64 0 >> Holding Back xfce4-settings:amd64 rather than change >> xfce4-mcs-plugins:amd64 >> Investigating (0) xfce4-session [ amd64 ] < 4.4.2-6 -> 4.6.2-2 > ( xfce ) >> Broken xfce4-session:amd64 Depends on xfce4-settings [ amd64 ] < none -> >> 4.6.5-3 > ( xfce ) >> Considering xfce4-settings:amd64 0 as a solution to xfce4-session:amd64 0 >> Holding Back xfce4-session:amd64 rather than change xfce4-settings:amd64 >> Try to Re-Instate (1) xfce4-session:amd64 >> Done > > I'm not sure why apt doesn't want to remove xfce4-mcs-plugin at all. Any > idea?
xfce4-mcs-manager recommends it. As APT has no indication that this package can go away it does the only right thing (TM): Chooses to keep xfce4-mcs-plugins as otherwise the user will lose functionality… (recommends are defined as installed on all, expect "unusual" systems, so their value is very close to a depends for APT) Best regards David Kalnischkies -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktino9o5nfbect-kif1=sj6jgspukvunjp3x4s...@mail.gmail.com