On 10/03/11 at 12:00 +0000, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2011-03-10, Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net> wrote: > > On 09/03/11 at 22:27 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > >> Lucas Nussbaum writes ("Ruby changes for Wheezy"): > >> > We are planning a rather large set of changes in Ruby packaging for > >> > Debian wheezy, and would appreciate some external feedback on our > >> > proposals. > >> > > >> > Our plans are described on > >> > http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/RubyInWheezy > >> > Don't hesitate to ask for details if needed. > >> > >> I think your families of packages > >> ruby1.8-foo > >> ruby1.9.1-foo > >> ruby-foo-common > >> etc. are overcomplicated. Can you not find a way to make only one > >> package for each extension, each containing an appropriate collection > >> of .so files etc. ? > > > > what we could do, indeed, is ship all the .so files in the same binary > > package, and then hack the Depends field to have: > > ruby1.8 | ruby-interpreter > > > > What is the correct way to override what dpkg-shlibdeps detects? > > you can override what dpkg-shlibdeps detect, but it sounds like you want > to write your own shlibs/symbol files that tells > ruby1.8 | ruby-interpreter for all involved libraries ? > > The last part of shlibs files is a free text file that is passed > verbatim into the depends file.
yes, but I also need to remove the part that says: libruby1.8, libruby1.9.1, librubinius, libjruby - Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110310121516.ga19...@xanadu.blop.info