Hi all, is there a specific reason why metapackages depend rather then recommend packages they are meant to pull in?
The rationale behind this question is [0] that we see a plethora of users in #debian who ask questions like: "Why did apt remove all my system??⸘!!!!one!one!eleven!" and we have to explain to them that it is because they decided to remove one of (typically) gnome's dependencies, which caused the metapackage to be removed as well. The solution is then to either mark all other dependencies as manually installed, install a smaller metapackage or a combination of those. As this is a common problem of our users I was thinking why we don't make it easier for them to slim down their system after they've done a default installation. Are there any drawbacks to this change in metapackage semantics that I am not aware of? [0] The rationale is also more or less the same as the one formulated for DEP-6 http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep6/ -- Wolodja <babi...@gmail.com> 4096R/CAF14EFC 081C B7CD FF04 2BA9 94EA 36B2 8B7F 7D30 CAF1 4EFC
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature