>>>>> Wolodja Wentland <babi...@gmail.com> writes: > is there a specific reason why metapackages depend rather then > recommend packages they are meant to pull in?
> The rationale behind this question is [0] that we see a plethora of > users in #debian who ask questions like: "Why did apt remove all my > system??⸘!!!!one!one!eleven!" > and we have to explain to them that it is because they decided to > remove one of (typically) gnome's dependencies, which caused the > metapackage to be removed as well. The solution is then to either > mark all other dependencies as manually installed, install a smaller > metapackage or a combination of those. Since turning these dependencies into Recommends: is apparently infeasible, it may be useful to amend APT to automatically mark the metapackage's dependencies as manually installed if the metapackage itself is so marked. Or do I miss something obvious with this approach? (Sorry, I'm not familiar with the subject. Beyond knowing to avoid metapackages at all costs, i. e.) […] -- FSF associate member #7257 Coming soon: Software Freedom Day http://mail.sf-day.org/lists/listinfo/ planning-ru (ru), sfd-discuss (en) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/867h5qamdt....@gray.siamics.net