On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 07:34:41PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > - Being able to judge whether the maintainers have done their part in > > reaching out to porters is a requisite for the above. And to do so, we > > really need more visibility of those exchanges. According to devref > > [1], the contact points we currently recommend are both the > > debian-$arch mailing lists and the $a...@buildd.debian.org addresses. > > > > Is there any reason why the latter are not public? > > Yes. Because one of the most frequent users is the security team > asking where this and that security build is. We don't want that > public for obvious reasons.
We changed this some time ago and made $arch readable by anybody, the mbox's are at: buildd.debian.org:/org/buildd.debian.org/mbox/ We've ask the security team to use wb-t...@buildd.debian.org instead, which is not public available. And there is also debian-wb-t...@lists.debian.org. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110910133306.ga11...@roeckx.be