On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 03:33:06PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 07:34:41PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > > > - Being able to judge whether the maintainers have done their part in > > > reaching out to porters is a requisite for the above. And to do so, we > > > really need more visibility of those exchanges. According to devref > > > [1], the contact points we currently recommend are both the > > > debian-$arch mailing lists and the $a...@buildd.debian.org addresses. > > > > > > Is there any reason why the latter are not public? > > > > Yes. Because one of the most frequent users is the security team > > asking where this and that security build is. We don't want that > > public for obvious reasons. > > We changed this some time ago and made $arch readable by anybody, > the mbox's are at: > buildd.debian.org:/org/buildd.debian.org/mbox/ > > We've ask the security team to use wb-t...@buildd.debian.org > instead, which is not public available.
Would have been nice if you'd also informed people of that fact. With 'people', I mean 'people who get mail sent to $arch@buildd.d.o', which hasn't happened AFAIK. -- The volume of a pizza of thickness a and radius z can be described by the following formula: pi zz a -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110910203045.gz4...@grep.be
